reply to Orzolek

At first it seemed Orzolek was running in circles with his head cut off describing all of the paradoxical effects in todays education. I feel more connected to what Orzolek has to say in regards that assessment needs to be opportunity filled for feedback with the students. The only feedback that students usually recieve is a letter grade which only tells the student if they have met the certain standard. Assessment is an important tool because it provides places of feedback where and how the students can specifically improve, rather than just telling the students they need to do better. I agree with Orzolek and really enjoy entertaining the new forms of assessment in portfolio's. I believe this is a huge step in the right direction. Not only does the product become assessed but also the process, which is a key factor that was being ignored previously. Something else I found to be interesting was that the States require that the standards be met but many do no have any means of reporting the progress. Since there are no formal ways to report progress, the states figure the arts programs are easy budget cuts. Problem, I think so.
Brophy treats assessment as an important means to report progress to whomever requires it. But he also seems to disclude room for critical thinking. Formal tests are the only way to show progress...NOT! I am sure this is not is goal, he just seems to be moving in this direction.